LogFAQs > #959880616

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, Database 9 ( 09.28.2021-02-17-2022 ), DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Rittenhouse takes the stand.
InfinityMonster 11/10/21 6:35:21 PM #281:	PoundGarden posted... I like how you left out it was a protest/riot that he went pretty far out of his way to attend to, again, protect property that wasn't his. With a gum he shouldn't have had in a state he did not reside. Literal vigilantism. A paramedic literally testified he thought Kyle was an active shooter. Sure. Going there to protect property that's not yours however is. And cut the BS, he was in no way qualified or trained to administer medical aid of any value. Yeah no. Shooting someone has a LOT of qualifiers. If it was that simple, we probably wouldn't be watching someone on trial for doing just that. It can be reasonably argued people were trying to disarm some idiot at a riot with a rifle they didn't know nor did they know his intentions. He traveled 20 miles. That's like going from the bottom of Manhattan to the top. It's irrelevant. That does not equal vigilantism nor is there any law banning him being there. He was never thought of as active shooter till he shot Rosenbaum and that was because Rosenbaum ambushed him and attacked him. The trial is going nowhere because the prosecution has nothing. If they didn't do a trial, people would have lost their shit. In reality, he would have plead guilty to the gun charges and this would have been over long ago. It's clear to anybody watching it's just a waste of time and money. There's no proof anybody thought they were theatened and decided to disarm him. This is especially given that the trial showed that everybody there was armed. You're reaching and you know it. At least watch the fucking trial. --- "It lies between the pit of man's fears and the summit of his knowledge" <cite>InfinityMonster posted [p:959880616] in Rittenhous... [t:79752524]...</cite> <quote>PoundGarden posted... </cite> <quote>I like how you left out it was a protest/riot that he went pretty far out of his way to attend to, again, protect property that wasn't his. With a gum he shouldn't have had in a state he did not reside. Literal vigilantism. A paramedic literally testified he thought Kyle was an active shooter. Sure. Going there to protect property that's not yours however is. And cut the BS, he was in no way qualified or trained to administer medical aid of any value. Yeah no. Shooting someone has a LOT of qualifiers. If it was that simple, we probably wouldn't be watching someone on trial for doing just that. It can be reasonably argued people were trying to disarm some idiot at a riot with a rifle they didn't know nor did they know his intentions.</quote>He traveled 20 miles. That's like going from the bottom of Manhattan to the top. It's irrelevant. That does not equal vigilantism nor is there any law banning him being there. He was never thought of as active shooter till he shot Rosenbaum and that was because Rosenbaum ambushed him and attacked him. The trial is going nowhere because the prosecution has nothing. If they didn't do a trial, people would have lost their shit. In reality, he would have plead guilty to the gun charges and this would have been over long ago. It's clear to anybody watching it's just a waste of time and money. There's no proof anybody thought they were theatened and decided to disarm him. This is especially given that the trial showed that everybody there was armed. You're reaching and you know it. At least watch the fucking trial. --- "It lies between the pit of man's fears and the summit of his knowledge"</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1