LogFAQs > #959879557

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, Database 9 ( 09.28.2021-02-17-2022 ), DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Rittenhouse takes the stand.
PoundGarden 11/10/21 6:00:42 PM #263:	InfinityMonster posted... Walking around with a gun in an open carry state is not illegal, nor is it called vigilantism nor can you attack someone for it. I like how you left out it was a protest/riot that he went pretty far out of his way to attend to, again, protect property that wasn't his. With a gum he shouldn't have had in a state he did not reside. Literal vigilantism. InfinityMonster posted... That's ignoring that there's no evidence Rosenbaum was scared of the gun or did what he did in any attempt to somehow stop him or to save everybody or something. No one has testified that they were scared or bothered because he had a gun. A paramedic literally testified he thought Kyle was an active shooter. InfinityMonster posted... Going around asking people if they need medical attention is not being a vigilante. Having a gun does not turn you into a vigilante since multiple people testified almost everybody there was carrying a gun, even actual medics. Sure. Going there to protect property that's not yours however is. And cut the BS, he was in no way qualified or trained to administer medical aid of any value. InfinityMonster posted... If you approach someone and attack them in an attempt to disarm them in a open carry state, you will be shot and it will be self-defense. Yeah no. Shooting someone has a LOT of qualifiers. If it was that simple, we probably wouldn't be watching someone on trial for doing just that. It can be reasonably argued people were trying to disarm some idiot at a riot with a rifle they didn't know nor did they know his intentions. --- "You go. I'm just going to stare at the lake and think about how I almost just killed a baby." <cite>PoundGarden posted [p:959879557] in Rittenhous... [t:79752524]...</cite> <quote>InfinityMonster posted... </cite> <quote>Walking around with a gun in an open carry state is not illegal, nor is it called vigilantism nor can you attack someone for it.</quote> I like how you left out it was a protest/riot that he went pretty far out of his way to attend to, again, protect property that wasn't his. With a gum he shouldn't have had in a state he did not reside. Literal vigilantism. InfinityMonster posted... </cite> <quote>That's ignoring that there's no evidence Rosenbaum was scared of the gun or did what he did in any attempt to somehow stop him or to save everybody or something. No one has testified that they were scared or bothered because he had a gun.</quote> A paramedic literally testified he thought Kyle was an active shooter. InfinityMonster posted... </cite> <quote>Going around asking people if they need medical attention is not being a vigilante. Having a gun does not turn you into a vigilante since multiple people testified almost everybody there was carrying a gun, even actual medics.</quote> Sure. Going there to protect property that's not yours however is. And cut the BS, he was in no way qualified or trained to administer medical aid of any value. InfinityMonster posted... </cite> <quote>If you approach someone and attack them in an attempt to disarm them in a open carry state, you will be shot and it will be self-defense.</quote> Yeah no. Shooting someone has a LOT of qualifiers. If it was that simple, we probably wouldn't be watching someone on trial for doing just that. It can be reasonably argued people were trying to disarm some idiot at a riot with a rifle they didn't know nor did they know his intentions. --- "You go. I'm just going to stare at the lake and think about how I almost just killed a baby."</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1