LogFAQs > #959872487

All good points! I guess my gut reaction is that if you say you want to shooter rioters, then bring a gun to an area you know there will likely be rioters, it isn't necessarily immaterial to the case.

If they bring up Kyle Rittenhouse said that, then they're allowed to bring up that Rosenbaum is a violent convicted pedophile sociopath that beats his girlfriend and was locked up in a mental hospital for being violent just a day prior.

And they need to allow Huber's past where he was a sociopath that held his brother at knife point and threatened him, choked out his sister for ten seconds, and threatening to kill his grandmother, along with other sadistic shit he plead guilty to.

I would also think past violent behavior is something the jury should be informed of as well! Especially if part of the defense's case is that these people acted violently first and caused the shooting.

I guess I'm just confused. If someone is on trial for beating their spouse, can the prosecution really not bring up the fact that they were abusive in two past relationships? It seems like if the defense here wants to argue that these two people acted violently, a history of them acting violently is something the jury should be aware of, no?

I'm clearly not a lawyer.

---

Moops?
"I thought you were making up diseases? That's spontaneous dental hydroplosion."