LogFAQs > #959868600

TLOU is a great game, but I don't think it belongs anywhere near this list.

Also, there is no way that BotW belongs over OoT, LttP, or even the original Zelda. You can argue for the other 3 for several reasons. BotW seems much more like a "it's very popular right now" type thing.

I also don't know how I feel about GTAV over VC or SA.

I also understand the need to have early arcade titles, but I don't know if you need both pac man and space invaders. Like ms pac man is by far the superior game. I understand that the judging was for a mix of things, but it does seem like they weighed stuff differently for different titles.

As for Mario Kart, not sure about this. I was never into the snes version and only really played once it was on 64. I don't really have the historical context on why it belongs on the list.

PokemonGos time was a little too short lived imo for the type of game it was. It caused a huge craze for a little bit, but now people rarely talk about it. Like how don't you put RBY on it? This is a glaring flaw in the list that puts the whole validity of it into question.

I think you have to choose between Halo or COD4. You can't have both.

As for games to add. Obviously I think OoT and Pokemon RBY are such big snubs. But A Final fantasy game (probably 7) and Maybe Skyrim too. Skyrim has almost unprecedented longevity for a "modern" title, people still talk about it today.

And, while I know it wasn't aged well... and there are problems with the company... it's hard not to put something like WoW (classic) or Starcraft up here too since we are weighing historical significance and popularity too.