LogFAQs > #959691555

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, Database 9 ( 09.28.2021-02-17-2022 ), DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	No Statute of Limitations on Murder in Australia
TheOtherMike 11/04/21 2:40:47 PM #19:	CobraGT posted... In all fairness dude lived 384 yards from the site at the time. On the other hand, my credit record knows where I lived yea many years ago but I have long forgotten and I certainly do not remember what I was doing on a particular day. The guy could have done it but if he is innocent he has no way of proving where he was or who he was with. And I do not like that burden of proof is now on defendant. ...the murderer left a large amount of blood at the crime scene, which can be matched to the suspect. The burden of proof was never on the defendant. <cite>TheOtherMike posted [p:959691555] in No Statute... [t:79743437]...</cite> <quote>CobraGT posted... </cite> <quote>In all fairness dude lived 384 yards from the site at the time. On the other hand, my credit record knows where I lived yea many years ago but I have long forgotten and I certainly do not remember what I was doing on a particular day. The guy could have done it but if he is innocent he has no way of proving where he was or who he was with. And I do not like that burden of proof is now on defendant.</quote> ...the murderer left a large amount of blood at the crime scene, which can be matched to the suspect. The burden of proof was never on the defendant. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1