LogFAQs > #959673138

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, Database 9 ( 09.28.2021-02-17-2022 ), DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Unpopular Opinion: The Hobbit movies aren't as bad as people say
FurryPhilosifer 11/03/21 11:24:03 PM #6:	I'm still baffled by the best parts of the first movie being the parts people complained about. "The party goes on too long". What, you mean the bit that's most accurate to the book? I think the reaction to that is why 2 and 3 ended up having so much boring action guff that was clearly made in a rush with bad CGI. Three films could have been filled out just fine with sections from the book and appendixes that were actually fleshed out. Instead we got sections from the book completely rushed through (That were at beorns house for like 4 minutes wtf that was my favourite part of the book) and 45 minute action scenes that weren't even alluded to in the books. --- Ghosts are cool. <cite>FurryPhilosifer posted [p:959673138] in Unpopular ... [t:79742645]...</cite> <quote>I'm still baffled by the best parts of the first movie being the parts people complained about. "The party goes on too long". What, you mean the bit that's most accurate to the book? I think the reaction to that is why 2 and 3 ended up having so much boring action guff that was clearly made in a rush with bad CGI. Three films could have been filled out just fine with sections from the book and appendixes that were actually fleshed out. Instead we got sections from the book completely rushed through (That were at beorns house for like 4 minutes wtf that was my favourite part of the book) and 45 minute action scenes that weren't even alluded to in the books. --- Ghosts are cool.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1