LogFAQs > #959126620

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, Database 9 ( 09.28.2021-02-17-2022 ), DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Jagger and McCartney feuding about who was better Stones or Beatles
ReturnOfFa 10/17/21 2:43:36 PM #16:	I'm far more of a Beatles head and consider their catalogue (although smaller) to have far more variety. I think it's hilarious that Paul called the Stones a Blues cover band. The Stones are still massively talented, but they're a lot more boring for me. --- girls like my fa <cite>ReturnOfFa posted [p:959126620] in Jagger and... [t:79714878]...</cite> <quote>I'm far more of a Beatles head and consider their catalogue (although smaller) to have far more variety. I think it's hilarious that Paul called the Stones a Blues cover band. The Stones are still massively talented, but they're a lot more boring for me. --- girls like my fa</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1