LogFAQs > #958339286

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, Database 9 ( 09.28.2021-02-17-2022 ), DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	It's a fact that people eat Pokemon.
Piplup_Sniper 09/23/21 4:12:17 PM #46:	SerperiorThanU posted... Wow, if anything that actually implies that animals do exist, since one of the most common fan theories is that that the reason there are stuff like human psychics and human ghosts is that humans are a type of Pokemon. If they're not that means they're their own seperate things which could mean there are other organisms that are their own separate things like other animals. Plus, it means that stuff like fossilized fish/fossilized bird confirms there are actual non-Pokemon versions of those since as he said, Pokemon wouldn't be categorized into something like "mammals" and "reptiles", orbirds and fish. that doesnt imply that. He implies they dont exist since he is contrasting the way we view animals to how the people of the Pokemon world view pokemon. As I already said for the 5th time real animals have never been a thing in pokemon. The pokemon themselves exist to fill in that role but in a fictional and fantasy manner. That handbook is not outdated since its an introduction to 3rd parties to the pokemon franchise. We at least know some of their rules are in effect mentioned by that handbook such as the pokemon not allowed to wear clothes rule mentioned by the film makers of detective pikachu --- Forbid it, Almighty God! U.S. Army. 13B. E-3 PFC <cite>Piplup_Sniper posted [p:958339286] in It's a fac... [t:79675013]...</cite> <quote>SerperiorThanU posted... </cite> <quote>Wow, if anything that actually implies that animals do exist, since one of the most common fan theories is that that the reason there are stuff like human psychics and human ghosts is that humans are a type of Pokemon. If they're not that means they're their own seperate things which could mean there are other organisms that are their own separate things like other animals. Plus, it means that stuff like fossilized fish/fossilized bird confirms there are actual non-Pokemon versions of those since as he said, Pokemon wouldn't be categorized into something like "mammals" and "reptiles", orbirds and fish.</quote>that doesnt imply that. He implies they dont exist since he is contrasting the way we view animals to how the people of the Pokemon world view pokemon. As I already said for the 5th time real animals have never been a thing in pokemon. The pokemon themselves exist to fill in that role but in a fictional and fantasy manner. That handbook is not outdated since its an introduction to 3rd parties to the pokemon franchise. We at least know some of their rules are in effect mentioned by that handbook such as the pokemon not allowed to wear clothes rule mentioned by the film makers of detective pikachu --- Forbid it, Almighty God! U.S. Army. 13B. E-3 PFC</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1