LogFAQs > #957057409

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, Database 9 ( 09.28.2021-02-17-2022 ), DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
Topic> WHO invents new names to avoid country-based variant names
Trumble
08/13/21 5:01:42 PM
#17:


CableZL posted...
So in regard to the delay in designating a name for a new variant, is there a threshold that needs to be crossed for a variant to be given a name? With over 200,000,000 cases globally, I'm guessing there have been many variants that weren't of enough concern to be given a name.

My understanding is that they get the name when they're declared (by the WHO) a variant of concern (Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Delta) or a variant of interest (Eta, Iota, Kappa, Lambda, and formerly Epsilon, Zeta and Theta).

A few more - such as the "Colombian variant" - are variants of interest/concern under country authorities, but not yet recognized as such by the WHO.

Awkwardly, I saw one researcher's article that suggested labelling the Colombian variant "zeta" - clearly that researcher didn't actually do their research. :P

---
The only thing we have to fear is Trumble itself.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1