LogFAQs > #956542404

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, Database 8 ( 02.18.2021-09-28-2021 ), DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Kelly Clarkson has to spend almost $200k a month in spousal & child support
Compsognathus 07/28/21 12:02:24 PM #13:	g0ldie posted... should someone be owed that kinda lifestyle, though? if she paid $200k a year instead, for example, that's still more money than most people can dream of. I think alimony should have some sort of upper limit. I understand its purpose, but even that cap has got to be judgment based as opposed to a hard rule. But overall I don't think someone is entitled to a particularly affluent living just because they were once married to a rich person. Child support is different. I would argue that the child absolutely deserves to be owed the kind of financial life their parents live. So if they are living with the non-wealthy parent, child support should be fairly high for the wealthy parent. --- Gheb is my other account <cite>Compsognathus posted [p:956542404] in Kelly Clar... [t:79586990]...</cite> <quote>g0ldie posted... </cite> <quote>should someone be owed that kinda lifestyle, though? if she paid $200k a year instead, for example, that's still more money than most people can dream of.</quote>I think alimony should have some sort of upper limit. I understand its purpose, but even that cap has got to be judgment based as opposed to a hard rule. But overall I don't think someone is entitled to a particularly affluent living just because they were once married to a rich person. Child support is different. I would argue that the child absolutely deserves to be owed the kind of financial life their parents live. So if they are living with the non-wealthy parent, child support should be fairly high for the wealthy parent. --- Gheb is my other account</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1