LogFAQs > #956130975

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, Database 8 ( 02.18.2021-09-28-2021 ), DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Wikipedia Founder says DON'T Trust the Site because LIBERAL MODS Took Over!!
Full Throttle 07/16/21 12:16:30 AM #1:	Do you trust conservative opinions? Yes No Do you trust conservative opinions? - Results (71 votes) Yes 32.39% (23 votes) 23 No 67.61% (48 votes) 48 52 y/o Mr Potato Head, Larry Sanger, who co-founded Wikipedia in 2001 alongside Jimm Wales is warning the world to NOT trust the site anymore for "unbiased information" because he claims the LEFT-WING volunteers have taken over the site and cut out any edits meant to provide balance!! He says the crowdsourcing project has betrayed its original mission by reflecting the views of the "establishment" and says the democratic volunteers remove content that isn't to their liking including information on scandals of Joe Biden and his son, Hunter When asked if the site can be trusted, he said "You can trust it to give a reliably establishment poin tof view on pretty much everything. Can you trust it to always give you the truth? Well, it depends on what you think the truth is" He cited Joe Biden's entry that doesn't include arguments from a GOP perspective and said "The Biden article, if you look at it, has very little by way of the concerns that Republicans have about him. So if you want to have anything remotely resembling the Republican point of view about Biden, you're not going to get it from the article. And tehre is a paragraph and it is a quite a long article so there should be at least a paragraph about the Ukraine scanal. Very little can be found on Wikipedia. What little can be found is extremely biased and reads like a defense counsel's brief, really" He says it also does't mention Hunter's 600,000 a year salary to serve on the board of the Ukrainian energy firm in Burisma Sanger says plenty of Republicans use Wikipedia and would be eager to go into articles and make editors to bring balance to the stories but claims the site moderators won't allow it which he says allows a huge incentive to wealthy and powerful people to seize control of things like Wikipedia in order to shore up power and that's not the wikipedia he founded. He believes it's unfair that Conservative perspectives are not allowed on the site and says their voices are important and valuable to today's political dicussion. Do you think conservative voices are trustworthy? https://i.imgur.com/m3rZBqN.jpg https://i.imgur.com/4mi40sY.jpg https://i.imgur.com/xV69GAT.jpg https://i.imgur.com/pcCB6mh.jpg https://i.imgur.com/qhQzlNn.jpg https://i.imgur.com/4RnhAdu.jpg --- The News Will Continue...For Now call me mrduckbear, sweater monkeys. I'm an Asian Liberal. RESIST The Alt-Right <cite>Full Throttle posted [p:956130975] in Wikipedia ... [t:79566872]...</cite> <quote> Do you trust conservative opinions? Yes No Vote View Results Do you trust conservative opinions? - Results (71 votes) Yes 32.39% (23 votes) 23 No 67.61% (48 votes) 48 Show Voting Form 52 y/o Mr Potato Head, Larry Sanger, who co-founded Wikipedia in 2001 alongside Jimm Wales is warning the world to NOT trust the site anymore for "unbiased information" because he claims the LEFT-WING volunteers have taken over the site and cut out any edits meant to provide balance!! He says the crowdsourcing project has betrayed its original mission by reflecting the views of the "establishment" and says the democratic volunteers remove content that isn't to their liking including information on scandals of Joe Biden and his son, Hunter When asked if the site can be trusted, he said "You can trust it to give a reliably establishment poin tof view on pretty much everything. Can you trust it to always give you the truth? Well, it depends on what you think the truth is" He cited Joe Biden's entry that doesn't include arguments from a GOP perspective and said "The Biden article, if you look at it, has very little by way of the concerns that Republicans have about him. So if you want to have anything remotely resembling the Republican point of view about Biden, you're not going to get it from the article. And tehre is a paragraph and it is a quite a long article so there should be at least a paragraph about the Ukraine scanal. Very little can be found on Wikipedia. What little can be found is extremely biased and reads like a defense counsel's brief, really" He says it also does't mention Hunter's 600,000 a year salary to serve on the board of the Ukrainian energy firm in Burisma Sanger says plenty of Republicans use Wikipedia and would be eager to go into articles and make editors to bring balance to the stories but claims the site moderators won't allow it which he says allows a huge incentive to wealthy and powerful people to seize control of things like Wikipedia in order to shore up power and that's not the wikipedia he founded. He believes it's unfair that Conservative perspectives are not allowed on the site and says their voices are important and valuable to today's political dicussion. Do you think conservative voices are trustworthy? https://i.imgur.com/m3rZBqN.jpg https://i.imgur.com/4mi40sY.jpg https://i.imgur.com/xV69GAT.jpg https://i.imgur.com/pcCB6mh.jpg https://i.imgur.com/qhQzlNn.jpg https://i.imgur.com/4RnhAdu.jpg --- The News Will Continue...For Now call me mrduckbear, sweater monkeys. I'm an Asian Liberal. RESIST The Alt-Right</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1