LogFAQs > #955438231

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, Database 8 ( 02.18.2021-09-28-2021 ), DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Current World Health Organization guidelines on COVID vaccines for children
Sexypwnstar 06/25/21 9:53:11 PM #19:	joe40001 posted... The literal begining of the sentence you are in says that this is the conclusion of the "WHO's Strategic Advisory Group of Experts (SAGE)" this is not the same thing as the official policy of the WHO. This is what their advisory group said, but even so the WHO knows the responsible thing is to wait until there is a lot of robust evidence: They haven't yet changed their policy. (It's the very next sentence that you aren't reading, apparently) A bunch of people saying "this seems safe" is not the same as making the official declaration that it is your policy that it IS safe. Do you even understand why we have vaccine trials in the first place? It's to conclude with relative certainty that the thing you think is probably safe is indeed actually safe. The WHO's current policy is the policy I shared, adults should get vaccinated, but when it comes to kids 12+: "Vaccine trials for children are ongoing and WHO will update its recommendations when the evidence or epidemiological situation warrants a change in policy." And obviously they are not saying anybody <12 should be vaccinated at this time. https://www.who.int/groups/strategic-advisory-group-of-experts-on-immunization/about So are you just trolling or do you not think that their recommendations are using EBM? No, their current policy and guidance is not the one you shared, you just shared a news article that isn't current. Do you know when the Pfizer vaccine was approved for ages >12? Obviously you don't. Their guidance is the link I posted, what the fuck do you think a news room is? --- https://imgur.com/Su4g5 https://imgur.com/21DiJ <cite>Sexypwnstar posted [p:955438231] in Current Wo... [t:79532093]...</cite> <quote>joe40001 posted... </cite> <quote>The literal begining of the sentence you are in says that this is the conclusion of the "WHO's Strategic Advisory Group of Experts (SAGE)" this is not the same thing as the official policy of the WHO. This is what their advisory group said, but even so the WHO knows the responsible thing is to wait until there is a lot of robust evidence: They haven't yet changed their policy. (It's the very next sentence that you aren't reading, apparently) A bunch of people saying "this seems safe" is not the same as making the official declaration that it is your policy that it IS safe. Do you even understand why we have vaccine trials in the first place? It's to conclude with relative certainty that the thing you think is probably safe is indeed actually safe. The WHO's current policy is the policy I shared, adults should get vaccinated, but when it comes to kids 12+: "Vaccine trials for children are ongoing and WHO will update its recommendations when the evidence or epidemiological situation warrants a change in policy." And obviously they are not saying anybody <12 should be vaccinated at this time.</quote> https://www.who.int/groups/strategic-advisory-group-of-experts-on-immunization/about So are you just trolling or do you not think that their recommendations are using EBM? No, their current policy and guidance is not the one you shared, you just shared a news article that isn't current. Do you know when the Pfizer vaccine was approved for ages >12? Obviously you don't. Their guidance is the link I posted, what the fuck do you think a news room is? --- https://imgur.com/Su4g5 https://imgur.com/21DiJ</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1