LogFAQs > #955273956

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, Database 8 ( 02.18.2021-09-28-2021 ), DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Supreme Court rules against NCAA, thoughts?
Questionmarktarius 06/21/21 1:27:29 PM #26:	ButteryMales posted... That's going to need a more elaborate explanation. Men's sports that aren't football will be dropped, if the players expect to be paid. The money being brought in will likely not cover the player salaries, and schools will be very reluctant to "subsidize" anything they're not legally obligated to do. One or two women's sports will remain, money-hole or not, because Title-IX mandates they exist. <cite>Questionmarktarius posted [p:955273956] in Supreme Co... [t:79525866]...</cite> <quote>ButteryMales posted... </cite> <quote>That's going to need a more elaborate explanation.</quote>Men's sports that aren't football will be dropped, if the players expect to be paid. The money being brought in will likely not cover the player salaries, and schools will be very reluctant to "subsidize" anything they're not legally obligated to do. One or two women's sports will remain, money-hole or not, because Title-IX mandates they exist. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1