LogFAQs > #955138541

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, Database 8 ( 02.18.2021-09-28-2021 ), DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Sooo, why is Lola Bunny over-corrected?
FortuneCookie 06/17/21 4:14:12 PM #99:	lolife67 posted... Most young women in sports aren't that toned and look more like new Lola than the previous version. And since this film is meant to appeal to kids, having the character look more like a young athlete than an grown woman makes a bit more sense to me. As a sequel, she would be older. I get they're doing the whole "toons don't age" thing, but her getting younger doesn't make sense. And I don't think that's what they're going for. Less sexy seems to be the top priority. She still looks fine. But the director made a point of how "inappropriate" the original version was. <cite>FortuneCookie posted [p:955138541] in Sooo, why ... [t:79519221]...</cite> <quote>lolife67 posted... </cite> <quote>Most young women in sports aren't that toned and look more like new Lola than the previous version. And since this film is meant to appeal to kids, having the character look more like a young athlete than an grown woman makes a bit more sense to me.</quote> As a sequel, she would be older. I get they're doing the whole "toons don't age" thing, but her getting younger doesn't make sense. And I don't think that's what they're going for. Less sexy seems to be the top priority. She still looks fine. But the director made a point of how "inappropriate" the original version was. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1