LogFAQs > #954394052

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, Database 8 ( 02.18.2021-09-28-2021 ), DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Outrage after a Philadelphia Steakhouse posted THIS MESSAGE Outside! Is it Bad?
streamofthesky 05/28/21 11:45:50 AM #18:	TheSlinja posted... what im saying is that 100 dollars is more than a normal meal there so its unreasonable to have the minimum that high Ok, but to-go containers are a thing (unless this place considers itself too "high class" for that as a loophole....). Obviously the $100 min. sucks no matter what, but if it bought enough food to have a dinner there and then like 2-3 reheated meals later on, at least the value of what you get is not bad. Vs. "the steaks are all $80 just on their own, so the minimum meal cost was pretty pointless to add" While I'd choose neither, if I had to, I'd much rather take option 1... <cite>streamofthesky posted [p:954394052] in Outrage af... [t:79482287]...</cite> <quote>TheSlinja posted... </cite> <quote>what im saying is that 100 dollars is more than a normal meal there so its unreasonable to have the minimum that high</quote>Ok, but to-go containers are a thing (unless this place considers itself too "high class" for that as a loophole....). Obviously the $100 min. sucks no matter what, but if it bought enough food to have a dinner there and then like 2-3 reheated meals later on, at least the value of what you get is not bad. Vs. "the steaks are all $80 just on their own, so the minimum meal cost was pretty pointless to add" While I'd choose neither, if I had to, I'd much rather take option 1... </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1