LogFAQs > #953195980

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, Database 8 ( 02.18.2021-09-28-2021 ), DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	is arkham knight any good?
Slayer_22 04/24/21 10:30:35 PM #37:	FridgeBeard posted... Absolutely, it was like they wanted to have it both ways, which I felt was overall detrimental to the story. Remember when the first trailers showed all the villains sort of working together to fill the void while Scarecrow kind of ruled from behind the scenes? The actual game felt nothing like that. Honestly? They should have nixed the whole ~~Arkham Knight~~ angle. ~~Red Hood~~ could have existed without that, just have that be something that already happened and have him show up like all the other ~~Bat Family~~ members. Remove that, take out ~~Joker~~ entirely, then have a Scarecrow working as the main villain with every other villain causing shit while Scarecrow gets stuff done. --- "And no I'm not signing your twitter after this type of attitude so don't ask..." - IIINCORRUPTIBLE <cite>Slayer_22 posted [p:953195980] in is arkham ... [t:79422877]...</cite> <quote>FridgeBeard posted...</cite> <quote>Absolutely, it was like they wanted to have it both ways, which I felt was overall detrimental to the story. Remember when the first trailers showed all the villains sort of working together to fill the void while Scarecrow kind of ruled from behind the scenes? The actual game felt nothing like that. </quote> Honestly? They should have nixed the whole Arkham Knight angle. Red Hood could have existed without that, just have that be something that already happened and have him show up like all the other Bat Family members. Remove that, take out Joker entirely, then have a Scarecrow working as the main villain with every other villain causing shit while Scarecrow gets stuff done. --- "And no I'm not signing your twitter after this type of attitude so don't ask..." - IIINCORRUPTIBLE</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1