LogFAQs > #952837249

Is there any actual evidence of them even doing anything remotely resembling potential car theft?

Or is the only "source" literally the claims of the murderer? I'm getting so fucking sick of this shit where the key to a successful defense is murder all the witnesses.
If the only account you have of how actions transpired prior to the homicide is the word of the killer, that shouldn't mean jack shit. Anything that can't be verified by video footage, crime scene investigation, or witnesses, shouldn't even be considered in court. The murderer's words mean nothing.