LogFAQs > #952390209

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, Database 8 ( 02.18.2021-09-28-2021 ), DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicThere is no good argument against investing towards zero emissions.
Jerry_Hellyeah
04/02/21 1:16:10 PM
#9:


RadiantJoyrock posted...
No, I'm acknowledging their problems by correcting you, its the fault of the government not doing its job, not the fault of harmful emissions being reduced. Besides, we can address that while we move to ,ero emissions, its not like it's going to be an instant swap, it will take at least 30 years.

Im saying right now, as we're having this discussion, that YES, THERE ARE MANY REASONS FOR PEOPLE TO NOT WANT TO MOVE TOWARDS ZERO EMISSIONS.

Youre acting like the argument against it is that polluting is fun or something.

You have to have support in place before you can even start talking about ripping out the foundations these communities are built upon. This hasnt happened time and time again, so obviously theres gonna be pushback when the fix is supposedly "Government will help you out.....yknow....eventually".

I honestly do not care who you want to blame. This issue goes beyond "pollution is bad".

---
This is a cool sig
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1