LogFAQs > #951155646

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, Database 8 ( 02.18.2021-09-28-2021 ), DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Wandavision 2: MCU Boogaloo
Mr Lasastryke 02/27/21 5:27:12 PM #207:	Paratroopa1 posted... Weren't they like, not legally able to call her Scarlet Witch? I might be mistaken on this but I thought they only got full control over the character a year ago which is why this reveal is even happening. i think that was it, yeah. disney was allowed to use scarlet witch and quicksilver but fox had the rights to the character names (because of both them debuted in an x-men comic?), so they couldn't use those. some of the rights stuff in the earlier days was kind of weird. i think disney was initially allowed to use the kree but not the skrulls for some reason? --- Geothermal terpsichorean ejectamenta <cite>Mr Lasastryke posted [p:951155646] in Wandavisio... [t:79307948]...</cite> <quote>Paratroopa1 posted... </cite> <quote>Weren't they like, not legally able to call her Scarlet Witch? I might be mistaken on this but I thought they only got full control over the character a year ago which is why this reveal is even happening.</quote> i think that was it, yeah. disney was allowed to use scarlet witch and quicksilver but fox had the rights to the character names (because of both them debuted in an x-men comic?), so they couldn't use those. some of the rights stuff in the earlier days was kind of weird. i think disney was initially allowed to use the kree but not the skrulls for some reason? --- Geothermal terpsichorean ejectamenta</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1