LogFAQs > #951096054

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, Database 8 ( 02.18.2021-09-28-2021 ), DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Politics Containment Topic 366: Neeran End to the Tandenic
LordoftheMorons 02/26/21 7:12:59 AM #113:	xp1337 posted... Addendum/Edit to my parliamentarian/presiding officer post there. I'm seeing some discussion that were Harris to overrule the parliamentarian it would require 60 votes to overrule Harris as well. I'm not entirely sure of that, but if true then I suppose that wouldn't be an impossible scenario then because you'd just need 41 votes to sustain her ruling so you could afford to lose Manchin, Sinema, and more even. Yeah I mentioned that earlier (at least based on what I read), but thats prior to the vote on the actual bill itself so Manchin/Sinema/etc could still vote no on that if they feel strongly that the process was unacceptable. --- Congrats to azuarc, GotD2 Guru champ! <cite>LordoftheMorons posted [p:951096054] in Politics C... [t:79315960]...</cite> <quote>xp1337 posted... </cite> <quote>Addendum/Edit to my parliamentarian/presiding officer post there. I'm seeing some discussion that were Harris to overrule the parliamentarian it would require 60 votes to overrule Harris as well. I'm not entirely sure of that, but if true then I suppose that wouldn't be an impossible scenario then because you'd just need 41 votes to sustain her ruling so you could afford to lose Manchin, Sinema, and more even.</quote>Yeah I mentioned that earlier (at least based on what I read), but thats prior to the vote on the actual bill itself so Manchin/Sinema/etc could still vote no on that if they feel strongly that the process was unacceptable. --- Congrats to azuarc, GotD2 Guru champ!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1