LogFAQs > #951024051

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, Database 8 ( 02.18.2021-09-28-2021 ), DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Radfem biologist: many men will no longer have a sexual partner in the future
WingsOfGood 02/24/21 1:35:15 PM #47:	tote_all posted... I'm guessing he's talking about NEETs being more prominent. I'm not sure if they actually make a higher % of the population now than they did 10 years ago. NEET's are not a gender thing. You have female NEET's. Since men have traditionally been considered the breadwinner they do tend to go off the radar more than the men though. pure_temper posted... i mean maybe my standards are just way too high but i've only known like 10 dudes who i'd consider marriageable in the last 10 years lol. so far, more women in their 20s were smarter/more educated. What made them not marriageable? They had bad jobs? Were immature? Bad personality? Didn't care for their partner? <cite>WingsOfGood posted [p:951024051] in Radfem bio... [t:79314191]...</cite> <quote>tote_all posted... </cite> <quote>I'm guessing he's talking about NEETs being more prominent. I'm not sure if they actually make a higher % of the population now than they did 10 years ago.</quote> NEET's are not a gender thing. You have female NEET's. Since men have traditionally been considered the breadwinner they do tend to go off the radar more than the men though. pure_temper posted... </cite> <quote>i mean maybe my standards are just way too high but i've only known like 10 dudes who i'd consider marriageable in the last 10 years lol. so far, more women in their 20s were smarter/more educated.</quote> What made them not marriageable? They had bad jobs? Were immature? Bad personality? Didn't care for their partner? </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1