LogFAQs > #951022367

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, Database 8 ( 02.18.2021-09-28-2021 ), DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicRadfem biologist: many men will no longer have a sexual partner in the future
teep_
02/24/21 12:47:54 PM
#1:


https://2iafp3idlzpjydahayrrzwlbjm-adwhj77lcyoafdy-deutschlandfunk-de.translate.goog /zukunft-der-menschheit-evolutionsbiologin-viele-maenner.1310.de.html?dram:article_id=492817

Not all males get a chance, many remain without females and without sex. That's the female choice, a law of evolution.

Sex is a finite resource for males that females control. The fact that males try often and persistently to establish sexual contact with females and that females almost always refuse these attempts is not a fault of the system - it is the system. "

Meike Stoverock spreads out the panorama of evolutionary biological connections with relish - and the conclusion that comes to mind when reading this: humans are also only mammals. From a scientific point of view, the principle of female choice must also apply to them. Thats how it used to be, the author explains convincingly.

[...]

Men who can no longer find women in this new world order should be cared for in other ways - Stoverock thinks about sex assistants and the role of prostitution, she describes pornography as a possible socially acceptable support for men.

"Men who never or only very rarely find sex partners must be given ethical and socially acceptable ways of meeting their sexual needs."


Thoughts, CE?
---
teep dumb as f*** fr - BatmanVonDoom
I'm gonna pound a 400 lb woman just to prove teep wrong - NigerianKnight
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1