| Topic List | Page List: 1 |
|---|---|
| Topic | Landlords provide housing |
| RedJackson 02/14/21 1:49:45 PM #59: | Shablagoo posted... The landlords, like all other men, love to reap where they never sowed, and demand a rent even for the natural produce of the earth. Landowners can't 'own' something when it's a piece of territory to a governing body, regular people have to rent out from the government initially because it's the only way they can get ahead. Taking away what is considered to generally be a safe bet from hardworking people just seems like an all around step backwards. You can up the value of minimum wage and we'd still be in an enclosed cage where our options are creating a product in the sea of many, becoming famous in some form (possible, becoming less over time), or working at a skill to such a high level that it affords people saying 'okay I'll invest in you' You can open up a business, sure but that ceiling of how many businesses you can fit in one place becomes important when you realize you need property for that and how it'll tank price margins for people due to competition Idk why we do the whole second guessing thing because we've already answered most of : Where do realistic acceptable property rights begin and end? Should we secure basic needs for all people? How do we resolve this? Free housing? Community developed? State developed?What about covering costs of homebuilding and allowing self-build or people hire it out? What if we remove land rights and just divvied it up? Do we first tackle things that support landlords like lenders? sans yer last two questions in which case, yeah I guess you're free to wonder I guess --- ... Copied to Clipboard! |
| Topic List | Page List: 1 |