LogFAQs > #950620812

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, Database 7 ( 07.18.2020-02.18.2021 ), DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Politics Containment Topic 364: Absolute Proof (Citation Needed)
HeroDelTiempo17 02/14/21 2:49:07 AM #411:	Jakyl25 posted... The fact that they technically can do that and theres no check on that power aside from packing the court is a real doozy Red Sox is actually right about this. Judicial review is a power the Supreme Court gave itself, not in the Constitution, so the check is literally Congress or the Executive Branch deciding to exercise their own power and just ignore the court's ruling if they disagree. We are free to start playing hardball any time! The problem is 200 years of goodwill towards the Court and ignoring the rule it literally made up would immediately expose how badly structured our government is. --- I definitely did not forget to put the 2020 GOTD Guru winner, azuarc in my sig! <cite>HeroDelTiempo17 posted [p:950620812] in Politics C... [t:79282723]...</cite> <quote>Jakyl25 posted... </cite> <quote>The fact that they technically can do that and theres no check on that power aside from packing the court is a real doozy</quote> Red Sox is actually right about this. Judicial review is a power the Supreme Court gave itself, not in the Constitution, so the check is literally Congress or the Executive Branch deciding to exercise their own power and just ignore the court's ruling if they disagree. We are free to start playing hardball any time! The problem is 200 years of goodwill towards the Court and ignoring the rule it literally made up would immediately expose how badly structured our government is. --- I definitely did not forget to put the 2020 GOTD Guru winner, azuarc in my sig!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1