LogFAQs > #950323190

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, Database 7 ( 07.18.2020-02.18.2021 ), DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicAgree/Disagree: the government should protect people from themselves
Muscles
02/05/21 7:21:51 PM
#3:


Shadowbird_RH posted...
I'd say the right place to draw the line is when it goes from endangering yourself to endangering yourself and others.. It can be annoying to have to wear a seatbelt, but if you're a parent and there are children depending on you and your refusal to wear one leaves your kid(s) without a parent, is that fair to them? Would it be fairer for the government to step in and force you to do something you don't like for the children's sake?

It's one thing to be free to make your own decisions, but if you can't be responsible enough to make the right decisions when other people are involved, then it falls to a higher power to make the right decision for you.
I pretty much agree with this, if you wanna smoke crack or buy a prostitute you should be able to, it's not hurting anyone else (assuming the prostitution is consensual)

---
Muscles
Chicago Bears | Chicago Blackhawks | Chicago Bulls | Chicago Cubs | NIU Huskies
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1