LogFAQs > #949461212

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, Database 7 ( 07.18.2020-02.18.2021 ), DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	So Far 198 republican reps voted NO on impeachment
ThePieReborn 01/13/21 3:01:50 PM #48:	Tyranthraxus posted... This isn't completely accurate. It only applies of the president is removed. If they convict him AFTER he's gone we don't know exactly what will happen. He will most likely keep the security detail though the pension and vacation money can be revoked. There's related (obviously not perfectly on point) historical precedent in the impeachments and subsequent trials of William Belknap and federal judge West Hughes Humphries. Congress historically has defined its own jurisdiction here. --- Party leader, passive-aggressive doormat, pasta eater extraordinaire! <cite>ThePieReborn posted [p:949461212] in So Far 198... [t:79236475]...</cite> <quote>Tyranthraxus posted... </cite> <quote>This isn't completely accurate. It only applies of the president is removed. If they convict him AFTER he's gone we don't know exactly what will happen. He will most likely keep the security detail though the pension and vacation money can be revoked.</quote>There's related (obviously not perfectly on point) historical precedent in the impeachments and subsequent trials of William Belknap and federal judge West Hughes Humphries. Congress historically has defined its own jurisdiction here. --- Party leader, passive-aggressive doormat, pasta eater extraordinaire!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1