LogFAQs > #948853411

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, Database 7 ( 07.18.2020-02.18.2021 ), DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Your Insight on why Chicago Public Schools insist on In Person NOW
CobraGT 12/28/20 4:50:41 PM #10:	Spiritlittle posted... I'm a high school teacher. We're still remote, but teachers had to return to the classroom on November 30. Numerous staff and teachers are testing positive and we don't even have kids in the buildings. It's not safe. Our current plan is four cohorts of students that will meet in-person twice a week. Example: Cohort 1 on Monday/Tuesday, everyone online Wednesday for cleaning and contact tracing, Cohort 2 on Thursday/Friday. Weekend to clean and contact trace. Cohort 3 and 4 the next week. They're online any time they're not in class with me. 10 kids max in each classroom, six feet apart, etc. It's a gigantic mess, and our interim superintendent is a moron. Parents just want their kids out of the house, and that is the saddest part. I am guessing that the positives did not change policy in any way. Chicago Public Schools has non-teaching staff that could do their work from home but they must come in even after an arbitrator concluded that their case for working remotely is stronger than CPS'. There are so many ways to fake case/death data. The simplest is understaffing the departments which process the data: for instance health, medical examiners, input scanning, internet site management. Another way which seems innocuous is to instantly move any pupil or staff with symptoms to remote status. This way remote learning gets the poop. You see school districts with data that pupils/teachers in remote learning are more likely to test positive, be hospitalized/die. --- GoldenSun/Crossbone Isle diagrams/ 18 teams known https://photobucket.com/u/SwordOfWheat/a/9990a2ee-25f3-4242-ae79-7d2d4b882be4 <cite>CobraGT posted [p:948853411] in Your Insig... [t:79203606]...</cite> <quote>Spiritlittle posted... </cite> <quote>I'm a high school teacher. We're still remote, but teachers had to return to the classroom on November 30. Numerous staff and teachers are testing positive and we don't even have kids in the buildings. It's not safe. Our current plan is four cohorts of students that will meet in-person twice a week. Example: Cohort 1 on Monday/Tuesday, everyone online Wednesday for cleaning and contact tracing, Cohort 2 on Thursday/Friday. Weekend to clean and contact trace. Cohort 3 and 4 the next week. They're online any time they're not in class with me. 10 kids max in each classroom, six feet apart, etc. It's a gigantic mess, and our interim superintendent is a moron. Parents just want their kids out of the house, and that is the saddest part.</quote> I am guessing that the positives did not change policy in any way. Chicago Public Schools has non-teaching staff that could do their work from home but they must come in even after an arbitrator concluded that their case for working remotely is stronger than CPS'. There are so many ways to fake case/death data. The simplest is understaffing the departments which process the data: for instance health, medical examiners, input scanning, internet site management. Another way which seems innocuous is to instantly move any pupil or staff with symptoms to remote status. This way remote learning gets the poop. You see school districts with data that pupils/teachers in remote learning are more likely to test positive, be hospitalized/die. --- GoldenSun/Crossbone Isle diagrams/ 18 teams known https://photobucket.com/u/SwordOfWheat/a/9990a2ee-25f3-4242-ae79-7d2d4b882be4</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1