LogFAQs > #948443655

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, Database 7 ( 07.18.2020-02.18.2021 ), DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicPolitics Containment Topic 350: TIME's Topic of the Year
Inviso
12/17/20 11:58:51 AM
#463:


Corrik7 posted...
To ensure representation incorporates both public opinion and states as entities.

You could have had whoever had the majority of states. Or who had the majority of people. They mixed it to give both representation. Works as intended.

It's not giving both representation though. It's literally just giving power to land over people. It effectively ignores about 80% of the country and put the entire electoral onus on about ten swing states.

Furthermore, there are more Republican voters in California than there are in Texas, yet their votes are completely meaningless. Same with Democratic voters in Texas compared to New York. It's working as intended in that it's a system that was always intended to give more power to fewer people. And that's a problem that needs to be corrected.

---
Touch fuzzy. Get fuzzier.
Inviso
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1