LogFAQs > #948334696

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, Database 7 ( 07.18.2020-02.18.2021 ), DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
Topic>claims a porn site has videos taken down
Darmik
12/14/20 5:48:32 PM
#40:


ultimate reaver posted...
the problem is that all evidence points to this problem being very small in size in terms of this stuff actually being found. The numbers I have been seeing as far as cited cases are like 100-something. And instead of, i dunno, actually using effective moderation tactics and seeking that content (which they can do, pornhub makes a shitton of money), they instead just dropped a nuke on a bunch of completely innocent people's content

I think either way they'd need to have some sort of verification process to completely solve the issue. Especially to stop revenge porn. With the amount of stories they of young teen girls getting nude videos of them constantly reuploaded on the site (one of which got 400k views) I really don't believe they only had 118 cases over 3 years.

It should probably be slightly more difficult to upload pornographic material on one of the biggest sites in the world than getting into a strip club.

nemu posted...
Because we don't know to what extent it was an actual issue. You could write a scathing article based on any site using their vagueries. I'm arguing against forced overreaction based on the influence of a publication that provides no substantial evidence to their claims despite being called journalists. They should not have the power to force things based on nothing but a flimsy article.

A major site like this isn't going to nuke most of its content if it wasn't easy enough to find. They were obviously very complacent if they still only hhad 80 moderators for one of the most popular sites in the world that was focused on adult content. This is on them.

---
Kind Regards,
Darmik
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1