LogFAQs > #948018699

adjl posted...

I'll also point out that there has been no shortage of efforts to inform people about this pandemic in a rational, educational manner.

I disagree. I've not seen these efforts. Quite to to the contrary I've seen deaths far fewer then expected and yet the president is said to have acted too leniently while at the same time the ones making this claim were opposed to the measures he did take. I've seen those in authority make a show of going into quarantine only to be spotted somewhere else. I've seen those calling for the lockdown act like it doesn't apply to them. They want people to take precautions that they won't take themselves. Apparently they don't think it's that serious of a threat either. They aren't persuaded by their own information.

The news reporters broadcasting the message of fear will point out when other people don't wear a mask and remove their own as soon as they think the cameras are off.

Then there was the "civil unrest". The lockdown doesn't apply to you if you're "peacfully" setting fire to a civic building, looting stores, or toppling statues so long as it's for a cause your local politician agrees with. They may call a wedding a super spreader event but there's no risk of contagion here.

---

No locked doors, no windows barred. No more things to make my brain seem SKARD.
Look at Mr. Technical over here >.> -BTB