LogFAQs > #947411116

There's two very strong points for intelligent design.

1. The first is the fine-tuned universe argument, that argues on how the very slightest variation in our universal constants could crumble our whole universe.
2. The second is the extreme complexity of life, boiled down to our very DNA which has such an elaborate amount of information, it's hard to not believe it was artificially created.

From what I observe, athiests argue the first point with the multiverse theory, which is just as baseless and unscientific, making their point rather moot and hypocritical.
They argue the second point by obviously...natural selection. I wouldn't say it's not plausible given our DNA has lots of junk info too but it still doesn't explain how life came to being that way in the first place. Even if natural selection is the mechanism, there has to be a doer/creator behind this mechanism, no? Randomness alone doesn't explain it.