LogFAQs > #947020145

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, Database 7 ( 07.18.2020-02.18.2021 ), DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Wyoming had 266,000 voters California had 15.5 million voters
Medussa 11/11/20 12:59:34 AM #10:	Proto_Spark posted... We could totally fix this by just mashing a bunch of states together. Who needs 50? We can get to like, 35 maybe. Its kicking the can down the road sure, but do we really need two Dakotas? i want to go the other way. all states must be between 500k and 5 million people. get too small (unlikely), get absorbed by your neighbor(s). get too big, get cut in half. borders redrawn every other census, on the not presidential election years. --- Boom! That's right, this is all happening! You cannot change the channel now! In recognition of your overwhelming victory, let's call it a draw. <cite>Medussa posted [p:947020145] in Wyoming ha... [t:79101493]...</cite> <quote>Proto_Spark posted... </cite> <quote>We could totally fix this by just mashing a bunch of states together. Who needs 50? We can get to like, 35 maybe. Its kicking the can down the road sure, but do we really need two Dakotas?</quote> i want to go the other way. all states must be between 500k and 5 million people. get too small (unlikely), get absorbed by your neighbor(s). get too big, get cut in half. borders redrawn every other census, on the not presidential election years. --- Boom! That's right, this is all happening! You cannot change the channel now! In recognition of your overwhelming victory, let's call it a draw.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1