LogFAQs > #945829261

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, Database 7 ( 07.18.2020-02.18.2021 ), DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Amy Coney Barrett Supreme Court confirmation hearings - Day 2
Zeus_LLC 10/13/20 11:29:47 PM #12:	[LFAQs-redacted-quote] Because she was nominated by Republicans, despite the fact that Republican-nominated candidates have a greater chance at being impartial than Democrat-nominated ones because, well, fuck impartiality. Otherwise there's the complaint that Obama's choice -- who wouldn't have cleared the senate vote anyway -- didn't come up for a vote at the end of his term. BlackScythe0 posted... She is going to make the supreme court need to get packed if she becomes a justice. No, she's not, any more than it needed to be packed when Democrats had more of their nominated justices sitting on the court. --- (\/)(\/)\|-\| <cite>Zeus_LLC posted [p:945829261] in Amy Coney ... [t:79037491]...</cite> <quote> <cite>[LFAQs-redacted-quote]</cite> Because she was nominated by Republicans, despite the fact that Republican-nominated candidates have a greater chance at being impartial than Democrat-nominated ones because, well, fuck impartiality. Otherwise there's the complaint that Obama's choice -- who wouldn't have cleared the senate vote anyway -- didn't come up for a vote at the end of his term. BlackScythe0 posted... </cite> <quote>She is going to make the supreme court need to get packed if she becomes a justice.</quote> No, she's not, any more than it needed to be packed when Democrats had more of their nominated justices sitting on the court. --- (\/)(\/)\|-\|</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1