LogFAQs > #945735749

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, Database 7 ( 07.18.2020-02.18.2021 ), DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Why do movie directors always screw up Stephen King adaptations?
redlem 10/11/20 4:27:10 PM #22:	I think alot of the bad reputation comes from all those 80's movies that were made from mediocre novels, like Firestarter, Cujo, Christine, and Pet Sematary and made into forgettable movies. The adaptations have been better lately in part because at this point King has more say in creative control and has a say in the director as opposed to just selling the right to a studio and leaving it all to chance. <cite>redlem posted [p:945735749] in Why do mov... [t:79032794]...</cite> <quote>I think alot of the bad reputation comes from all those 80's movies that were made from mediocre novels, like Firestarter, Cujo, Christine, and Pet Sematary and made into forgettable movies. The adaptations have been better lately in part because at this point King has more say in creative control and has a say in the director as opposed to just selling the right to a studio and leaving it all to chance. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1