LogFAQs > #945627565

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, Database 7 ( 07.18.2020-02.18.2021 ), DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicProsecutors want to use RACIST SOCIAL MEDIA of the Men who Killed AHMAUD ARBERY
SKARDAVNELNATE
10/08/20 7:46:21 PM
#15:


adjl posted...
In practice, however, I believe it is a different charge, so it needs to be considered now.
Here's what I find dubious about that. Let's say the defense successfully argues that they were making a citizens arrest of an individual they believed to have committed a crime. This means they were acting lawfully in order to detain and question that individual. With hate crime being a different change they would be not guilty of having committed a crime, but still guilty of impure motivations for what was otherwise deemed a lawful act.

In my understanding a hate crime is a more severe form of the initial crime. So if there is no initial crime it cannot also be a hate crime. However making it a separate change means it can exist independently. It sounds like an excuse to still punish them even if found not guilty.

---
No locked doors, no windows barred. No more things to make my brain seem SKARD.
Look at Mr. Technical over here >.> -BTB
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1