LogFAQs > #945493950

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, Database 7 ( 07.18.2020-02.18.2021 ), DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicAlito and Thomas are already taking aim at the Obergefell decision
s0nicfan
10/05/20 5:58:05 PM
#17:


FlameTurtle posted...
It's so strange how some people, upon hearing that gay marriage is now legal, instantly have the thought of "well, nobody should be able to get married then."

It's a lot of "taking your ball and going home" energy.

Nobody is saying that. The discussion is over whether marriage, a religious institution, should confer legal benefits to married couples in a country that has constitutionalized the separation of church and state.

I think there are good arguments for having benefits that encourage family stability which is why I suggested moving those benefits over to civil unions which anybody can get.

Either way, the only reason anybody can even make a religious liberty argument is because people keep insisting that "marriage" specifically should be a protected right and not the legal benefits conferred to it.

---
"History Is Much Like An Endless Waltz. The Three Beats Of War, Peace And Revolution Continue On Forever." - Gundam Wing: Endless Waltz
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1