LogFAQs > #945033056

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, Database 7 ( 07.18.2020-02.18.2021 ), DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	President Trump issues "Born Alive" Executive Order
Wanded 09/24/20 3:09:00 PM #22:	Entity13 posted... do not assume I am OK with anyone resorting to any measure just because I have not commented on it isn't this exactly what you did in the other topic though with the other guy? you insinuated i am a hypocrite because you didn't see a post from me about trump, hence assumed i am okay with whatever it is you think trump is doing. Entity13 posted... and credibility sinks when you see that it scores as far right and mixed in terms of factual reporting. https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-daily-wire/ how do you know that site isn't lying and is leftist itself? that site is basically a failed attempt at argument from authority and i say failed because it has zero authority lol looking at the wiki for the site: The Columbia Journalism Review describes Media Bias/Fact Check as an amateur attempt at categorizing media bias and Van Zandt as an "armchair media analyst."[3] The Poynter Institute notes, "Media Bias/Fact Check is a widely cited source for news stories and even studies about misinformation, despite the fact that its method is in no way scientific."[5] Alexandra Kitty, in a 2018 book on journalism, described MBFC as an apparent "amateur/civic outfit" and wrote that its founder's only qualification was a degree in communications.[4] if you have a problem with the source explain what it got wrong, you can't say it's wrong because you don't like it, besides you actually think president trump didn't issue this executive order? why is this even an issue we are talking about --- Puss in Boots was a good movie and it deserves more recognition <cite>Wanded posted [p:945033056] in President ... [t:78995798]...</cite> <quote>Entity13 posted... </cite> <quote>do not assume I am OK with anyone resorting to any measure just because I have not commented on it</quote>isn't this exactly what you did in the other topic though with the other guy? you insinuated i am a hypocrite because you didn't see a post from me about trump, hence assumed i am okay with whatever it is you think trump is doing. Entity13 posted... </cite> <quote>and credibility sinks when you see that it scores as far right and mixed in terms of factual reporting. https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-daily-wire/</quote>how do you know that site isn't lying and is leftist itself? that site is basically a failed attempt at argument from authority and i say failed because it has zero authority lol looking at the wiki for the site: The Columbia Journalism Review describes Media Bias/Fact Check as an amateur attempt at categorizing media bias and Van Zandt as an "armchair media analyst."[3] The Poynter Institute notes, "Media Bias/Fact Check is a widely cited source for news stories and even studies about misinformation, despite the fact that its method is in no way scientific."[5] Alexandra Kitty, in a 2018 book on journalism, described MBFC as an apparent "amateur/civic outfit" and wrote that its founder's only qualification was a degree in communications.[4] if you have a problem with the source explain what it got wrong, you can't say it's wrong because you don't like it, besides you actually think president trump didn't issue this executive order? why is this even an issue we are talking about --- Puss in Boots was a good movie and it deserves more recognition</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1