LogFAQs > #943217779

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, Database 7 ( 07.18.2020-02.18.2021 ), DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Hmmm interesting, another Darkprince-related topic was locked by the Mods
I Like Toast 08/10/20 1:29:23 PM #42:	Ps2Twilight posted... You should probably read that mod note. the note that says i'm sensitive mod don't mark my post so i'm suspending you for doing what you're supposed to do and marking most that is a violation of the rules? yeah i read it. Feel free to explain how marking a single post can ever warrant abuse. Ps2Twilight posted... [Citation needed] I Like Toast posted... . Then the system of no accountability works to protect that certain mod Ps2Twilight posted... Read the second part of my original post. I Like Toast posted... And here you are defending the blatant abuse of a mod holding a personal grudge, rather than you know, that accountability thing. Ps2Twilight posted... There's no "Abuse" to defend, in your case. Sorry to say. mod: doing this thing is against the rules mod: does thing he just said is against the rules user: marks post, references how mod literally just said this is against the rules mod: SUSPENSION how dare you think i have to follow the rules i enforce on others! if there wasn't abuse. state why it's suspendable to mark a single post of a mod who broke the rules they just said were rules. but thanks for continuing to prove the 0 accountability, because mod's will always choose to defend themselves then stand against abuse. --- If you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all https://mikelikesthis.net the blog no one asked for is back <cite>I Like Toast posted [p:943217779] in Hmmm inter... [t:78903587]...</cite> <quote>Ps2Twilight posted... </cite> <quote> You should probably read that mod note.</quote> the note that says i'm sensitive mod don't mark my post so i'm suspending you for doing what you're supposed to do and marking most that is a violation of the rules? yeah i read it. Feel free to explain how marking a single post can ever warrant abuse. Ps2Twilight posted... </cite> <quote> [Citation needed]</quote> I Like Toast posted... </cite> <quote>. Then the system of no accountability works to protect that certain mod</quote> Ps2Twilight posted... </cite> <quote> Read the second part of my original post.</quote> I Like Toast posted... </cite> <quote> And here you are defending the blatant abuse of a mod holding a personal grudge, rather than you know, that accountability thing.</quote> Ps2Twilight posted... </cite> <quote> There's no "Abuse" to defend, in your case. Sorry to say.</quote> mod: doing this thing is against the rules mod: does thing he just said is against the rules user: marks post, references how mod literally just said this is against the rules mod: SUSPENSION how dare you think i have to follow the rules i enforce on others! if there wasn't abuse. state why it's suspendable to mark a single post of a mod who broke the rules they just said were rules. but thanks for continuing to prove the 0 accountability, because mod's will always choose to defend themselves then stand against abuse. --- If you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all https://mikelikesthis.net the blog no one asked for is back</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1