LogFAQs > #941484795

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, Database 6 ( 01.01.2020-07.18.2020 ), DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Which was better overall? The Prequel Trilogy or the Sequel Trilogy?
Megaman50100 06/30/20 3:12:47 PM #30:	overall story and creativity much better in the prequels but really bad character and scene writing and general film-making. General film and effects practices much better in the sequels but overall story-writing and creativity is terrible. So really pick your poison. For something that is supposed to be part of an epic, I am more disappointed and turned away by the trilogy that is the most awkward in the full-scale of the storyline (and it overwriting a lot of storylines where the main cast weren't sitting around or otherwise failing to do things for 25 years.) --- move all remaining groundhog mercenaries to the front lines. Have sheep troopers squadrons A and B flank the cows. They're using DC-17 hoof blasters. <cite>Megaman50100 posted [p:941484795] in Which was ... [t:78814545]...</cite> <quote>overall story and creativity much better in the prequels but really bad character and scene writing and general film-making. General film and effects practices much better in the sequels but overall story-writing and creativity is terrible. So really pick your poison. For something that is supposed to be part of an epic, I am more disappointed and turned away by the trilogy that is the most awkward in the full-scale of the storyline (and it overwriting a lot of storylines where the main cast weren't sitting around or otherwise failing to do things for 25 years.) --- move all remaining groundhog mercenaries to the front lines. Have sheep troopers squadrons A and B flank the cows. They're using DC-17 hoof blasters.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1