LogFAQs > #941484557

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, Database 6 ( 01.01.2020-07.18.2020 ), DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Which was better overall? The Prequel Trilogy or the Sequel Trilogy?
GodIsImaginary 06/30/20 3:07:51 PM #27:	DevsBro posted... The argument is that the movie sucked. The CG looked great for the time. ST's effects will age much better than the PT, because the sequels embraced the "aged technology" look from the originals and built real sets, real models....it makes it all the more frustrating that they nailed the superficial parts of what made the originals good like special effects, but failed on the basic level of storytelling. <cite>GodIsImaginary posted [p:941484557] in Which was ... [t:78814545]...</cite> <quote>DevsBro posted... </cite> <quote>The argument is that the movie sucked. The CG looked great for the time.</quote> ST's effects will age much better than the PT, because the sequels embraced the "aged technology" look from the originals and built real sets, real models....it makes it all the more frustrating that they nailed the superficial parts of what made the originals good like special effects, but failed on the basic level of storytelling. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1