LogFAQs > #941137907

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, Database 6 ( 01.01.2020-07.18.2020 ), DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Authors don't owe you a sequel and if you trash them for it you're an asshole.
Jabodie 06/23/20 3:22:53 PM #37:	Balrog0 posted... he had planned a trilogy but it has just gotten away from him Like a feast for crows literally exists because he decided an originally planned time skip wouldn't be enough to explain to the reader everything they would miss in the narrative It's just a weird thing to bring up in this topic because it's grrms inability to finish the story rather than a demand for more books from the fans, like most fans would rather have had the time skip and fewer books to read but an actual resolution to the story. No one is really asking for more content any more Eh, personally I'd rather keep the quality up than take "shortcuts." And regarding the time skip, I remember the issue being that many characters wouldn't wait five years to pursue many of the plotlines he wanted to tell, so it became a mess for him. But I've made peace with never having another book. Even without a resolution, what we have is excellent and worth reading. Like I'd rather he take his time but die before finishing than he "rush" (by his standards) something out so it's done. --- <insert sig here> <cite>Jabodie posted [p:941137907] in Authors do... [t:78796776]...</cite> <quote>Balrog0 posted... </cite> <quote>he had planned a trilogy but it has just gotten away from him Like a feast for crows literally exists because he decided an originally planned time skip wouldn't be enough to explain to the reader everything they would miss in the narrative It's just a weird thing to bring up in this topic because it's grrms inability to finish the story rather than a demand for more books from the fans, like most fans would rather have had the time skip and fewer books to read but an actual resolution to the story. No one is really asking for more content any more</quote>Eh, personally I'd rather keep the quality up than take "shortcuts." And regarding the time skip, I remember the issue being that many characters wouldn't wait five years to pursue many of the plotlines he wanted to tell, so it became a mess for him. But I've made peace with never having another book. Even without a resolution, what we have is excellent and worth reading. Like I'd rather he take his time but die before finishing than he "rush" (by his standards) something out so it's done. --- <insert sig here></quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1