LogFAQs > #941029508

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, Database 6 ( 01.01.2020-07.18.2020 ), DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	What's wrong with taking the Bible literally?
ThyCorndog 06/21/20 3:50:32 PM #35:	Lorenzo_2003 posted... Ehh, I agree with your first part, but I advise caution on that second claim. We do not know for a fact that stories like exodus didn't happen in reality. We simply do not have evidence that it did happen. Until we have definitive evidence, then I would agree that theres no reason to think it did. But that is not the same as saying we know it as a fact. The difference might be subtle, but its there. jews didn't exist during the time the story would have taken place. about 1500 BC is the birth of judaism and the exodus story would push that back at least a couple of thousand years --- https://imgur.com/6cPXvLN https://imgur.com/hVC4i6j <cite>ThyCorndog posted [p:941029508] in What's wro... [t:78790893]...</cite> <quote>Lorenzo_2003 posted... </cite> <quote>Ehh, I agree with your first part, but I advise caution on that second claim. We do not know for a fact that stories like exodus didn't happen in reality. We simply do not have evidence that it did happen. Until we have definitive evidence, then I would agree that theres no reason to think it did. But that is not the same as saying we know it as a fact. The difference might be subtle, but its there.</quote>jews didn't exist during the time the story would have taken place. about 1500 BC is the birth of judaism and the exodus story would push that back at least a couple of thousand years --- https://imgur.com/6cPXvLN https://imgur.com/hVC4i6j</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1