LogFAQs > #940961019

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, Database 6 ( 01.01.2020-07.18.2020 ), DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicCE's Hottest Woman Tournament II - The Nomination Topic
So_Hajile
06/20/20 7:58:32 AM
#44:


First off, I'm loving the amount of nominations already and how some are also including pictures. @Captain_Qwark took it to the next level and posted a video. Nice thing about pics / vids is that, if someone isn't well known, it may help sway attention and votes to the nominee. Also, I checked out Sith__Master's nominee, Sabrina Lynn, and wow. I immediately found a gif that's really something. O_O

I've given some more thought about Salma Hayek (the previous tournament winner) and her participation. SuperExcitebike makes a good point in that she may receive backlash for already winning a tournament. Basically, a biased view so members may be voting against her out of spite.

However, the same could be said for any of the nominees who participated in the previous tournament. Also, the point of the tournament is to determine the "hottest woman" according to CE. If she truly is, she should win again even against different opponents. It's similar to the game tournaments on this site. Ocarina of Time and Final Fantasy 7 always do so well even though people are sick of them winning. Yet they do because many find them to be the best game(s) for whatever reason.

If Hayek were to be taken out of the tournament proper and only placed in a match against the winner, there's something defeating about it. Like if a nominee goes through the tournament, wins, then squares off against Hayek immediately and loses. It seems like no matter what, it could have been an outcome that could have been determined much earlier if Hayek was already a participant.

I'm also thinking of future tournaments and where we end up with multiple winners over time. It seems odd to have the newest winner then square off against all the prior winners. This would set the precedent which is why I'm being careful about this. So let me ask CE this:

Make Hayek only appear against the tournament winner at the end?

Or

Would you have the previous tournament winners earn a spot in the following tournaments? For example, Hayek would be a participant in this tournament, the third (I know, if there even is one) would have Hayek and the latest winner included as well and so on.

Or

What if the tournament winners are excluded? They're put in the hall of fame / winner circle / pantheon of the greats, maybe to move on to an eventual "winners tournament" at some point.

Keep up the nominations everyone!

---
Reading up on the Bat-Family: https://bit.ly/2Us5RhG
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1