LogFAQs > #940926914

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, Database 6 ( 01.01.2020-07.18.2020 ), DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
Topici like how redhats went from NO SHUTDOWN to PROTESTS BAD DEADLY to NO SHUTDOWN
Guide
06/19/20 3:07:30 PM
#77:


karlpilkington4 posted...
You said

Its either a contradiction or a major error on your part.

This is a misinterpretation on your part. I'm giving the benefit of the doubt in that it's not willful misinterpretation, even though that's very common in these scenarios. You seem to be trying to be genuine, so I'll try. And I'm going to be redundant to try and be as clear as possible, forgive that.

---

As I said, simply believing in something doesn't give it any validity. It is the reasoning behind those beliefs, literally why you believe it.

As in, you can believe in something for any reason. The act, the verb of believing, being in the position of holding a belief, doesn't make it as valid as any other belief.

There is the belief that lizard people control the government. The reasoning behind that is poor, thus reducing or eliminating the validity of that belief.

There is belief that dinosaurs were around millions of years ago. The reasoning behind that is solid, thus granting validity to the belief.

The statement I take issue with, that Gob used, is that simply having a belief makes it equally as valid as any other beliefs. No. There's nothing inherently equal about differing beliefs. What matters, as if I haven't said it enough times, is the reasoning that leads to the belief.

Again I'm being redundant to be as clear as I possibly can be. Do you see what I mean, now?

Am I being clear?

---
formerly evening formerly guide
https://youtu.be/Acn5IptKWQU
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1