LogFAQs > #940749642

Inviso posted...

You shared the post. You made it clear what the implication was behind sharing that post and the wording you used to share it. Don't be a coward if you're not going to stand behind the words you used.

i'm sticking behind the words i used.
i'm not sticking behind the words you made up.

Jakyl25 posted...

Simple question:
Did you take the statement you shared at its word when you shared it

depends on which part.
that they were poisoned, sure. i'll take that at its word because it's a severe enough claim that can be easily verified by media/investigators that it'd be a massive error. if that part were to be faked that'd be a major story in and of itself.

the intent, not so much. it's either really inconvenient timing or on purpose, one of those two. either way, intent ain't gonna be known immediately but of course the union's gonna go that way. and it of course will become national news and way more important than, say, a cup. your options are either attempted murder or massive negligence to the point of a crime, either way someone fucked up pretty badly at that shake shack.

the rest of the flavor text, nah. that's just rhetoric.

---

"Maybe it's a tentacle, molesting the planet itself. - Aschen Brodel.