LogFAQs > #940589619

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, Database 6 ( 01.01.2020-07.18.2020 ), DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	''There is no proof necessary for denial'' is not a good argument from atheists
LostForest 06/12/20 9:47:57 PM #38:	Funkydog posted... No it doesn't require evidence, and no amount of people claiming this makes it so. We simply believe nothing shows that a deity exists, just like nothing shows the flying spaghetti monster exists. It is the lack of evidence that supports our belief, and faith requires you to believe despite a lack of evidence or it wouldn't be faith. It'd be a scientific fact. The problem with comparing God VS a spaghetti monster is that a godlike figure, or lack thereof, carries certain grand-scale implications about the universe. A spaghetti monster doesn't. --- http://dracanea.net <cite>LostForest posted [p:940589619] in ''There is... [t:78767050]...</cite> <quote>Funkydog posted... </cite> <quote>No it doesn't require evidence, and no amount of people claiming this makes it so. We simply believe nothing shows that a deity exists, just like nothing shows the flying spaghetti monster exists. It is the lack of evidence that supports our belief, and faith requires you to believe despite a lack of evidence or it wouldn't be faith. It'd be a scientific fact.</quote> The problem with comparing God VS a spaghetti monster is that a godlike figure, or lack thereof, carries certain grand-scale implications about the universe. A spaghetti monster doesn't. --- http://dracanea.net</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1