LogFAQs > #940581814

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, Database 6 ( 01.01.2020-07.18.2020 ), DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	''There is no proof necessary for denial'' is not a good argument from atheists
LostForest 06/12/20 6:59:21 PM #34:	Agreed TC. As a Christian, I will flat out admit that Agnosticism makes the most sense out of the three, with atheism and theism being two sides of the same coin. Declaring yourself as atheist, you're declaring there is no God, which in and of itself requires some form of evidence, because contrary to what gets parroted fucking constantly, you can in fact prove a negative statement. And in that same breath, making the claim that no God exists is almost as grand of a concept as claiming that there is one. So honestly, the two are pretty damn close to one another. I feel like a lot of people who aren't into religion would fall into the Agnostic camp, but just don't really grasp the idea of it. So instead they erroneously identify as atheist. --- http://dracanea.net <cite>LostForest posted [p:940581814] in ''There is... [t:78767050]...</cite> <quote>Agreed TC. As a Christian, I will flat out admit that Agnosticism makes the most sense out of the three, with atheism and theism being two sides of the same coin. Declaring yourself as atheist, you're declaring there is no God, which in and of itself requires some form of evidence, because contrary to what gets parroted fucking constantly, you can in fact prove a negative statement. And in that same breath, making the claim that no God exists is almost as grand of a concept as claiming that there is one. So honestly, the two are pretty damn close to one another. I feel like a lot of people who aren't into religion would fall into the Agnostic camp, but just don't really grasp the idea of it. So instead they erroneously identify as atheist. --- http://dracanea.net</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1