LogFAQs > #940581809

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, Database 6 ( 01.01.2020-07.18.2020 ), DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	''There is no proof necessary for denial'' is not a good argument from atheists
Tyranthraxus 06/12/20 6:59:10 PM #33:	Damn_Underscore posted... Pointless in the sense that you can say "there is probably is no God because of x y and z" and it wouldn't affect me at all. Just like if I said "I believe in God because of a b and c" and it wouldn't affect you at all. Not to mention that regardless of the existence of different gods, each religion, its writings, and its teachings stands on its own. You can live your life as a Buddhist or following Jesus or following the Quran and it wouldn't matter whether the claims of these religions/people/books are true. In particular, following Jesus isn't really any different practically than following Socrates and following the Quran isn't really any different practically than following the writings of some philosopher. That really only means the act of arguing with you specifically is pointless. Burden of proof is an extremely important point for many claims, not just ones about God. --- It says right here in Matthew 16:4 "Jesus doth not need a giant Mecha." https://imgur.com/dQgC4kv <cite>Tyranthraxus posted [p:940581809] in ''There is... [t:78767050]...</cite> <quote>Damn_Underscore posted... </cite> <quote>Pointless in the sense that you can say "there is probably is no God because of x y and z" and it wouldn't affect me at all. Just like if I said "I believe in God because of a b and c" and it wouldn't affect you at all. Not to mention that regardless of the existence of different gods, each religion, its writings, and its teachings stands on its own. You can live your life as a Buddhist or following Jesus or following the Quran and it wouldn't matter whether the claims of these religions/people/books are true. In particular, following Jesus isn't really any different practically than following Socrates and following the Quran isn't really any different practically than following the writings of some philosopher.</quote> That really only means the act of arguing with you specifically is pointless. Burden of proof is an extremely important point for many claims, not just ones about God. --- It says right here in Matthew 16:4 "Jesus doth not need a giant Mecha." https://imgur.com/dQgC4kv</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1