LogFAQs > #940580894

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, Database 6 ( 01.01.2020-07.18.2020 ), DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	''There is no proof necessary for denial'' is not a good argument from atheists
Tyranthraxus 06/12/20 6:38:43 PM #26:	Damn_Underscore posted... Despite this, people try to dispel faith as if it was science. And faith isn't just a guess. People have faith in different things because they've read different things or seen different things, etc. People's differing personalities are probably a big reason why different people approach faith differently as well. I'm not trying to argue that God exists in this topic. I'm simply trying to say that atheists' arguments that God doesn't exist are pointless for various reasons. You saying arguments are pointless isn't the same thing as the arguments actually being pointless. --- It says right here in Matthew 16:4 "Jesus doth not need a giant Mecha." https://imgur.com/dQgC4kv <cite>Tyranthraxus posted [p:940580894] in ''There is... [t:78767050]...</cite> <quote>Damn_Underscore posted... </cite> <quote>Despite this, people try to dispel faith as if it was science. And faith isn't just a guess. People have faith in different things because they've read different things or seen different things, etc. People's differing personalities are probably a big reason why different people approach faith differently as well. I'm not trying to argue that God exists in this topic. I'm simply trying to say that atheists' arguments that God doesn't exist are pointless for various reasons.</quote> You saying arguments are pointless isn't the same thing as the arguments actually being pointless. --- It says right here in Matthew 16:4 "Jesus doth not need a giant Mecha." https://imgur.com/dQgC4kv</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1