LogFAQs > #940579365

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, Database 6 ( 01.01.2020-07.18.2020 ), DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	''There is no proof necessary for denial'' is not a good argument from atheists
Zikten 06/12/20 6:06:36 PM #16:	MKScorpion posted... Forget proof, how about some evidence? I haven't even seen that yet. Also, no proof or evidence is a good argument. I could say there is an invisible ice cream shitting taco in the sky, would you believe me just because you can't prove said taco doesn't exist? Religious people will always tell you there is plenty of evidence. The problem is their idea of evidence isn't scientific. They cite their "feelings" like sensing God. Or cite the Bible. Because they think its a historical document. You can't win when you get into that kind of debate with religious people <cite>Zikten posted [p:940579365] in ''There is... [t:78767050]...</cite> <quote>MKScorpion posted...</cite> <quote>Forget proof, how about some evidence? I haven't even seen that yet. Also, no proof or evidence is a good argument. I could say there is an invisible ice cream shitting taco in the sky, would you believe me just because you can't prove said taco doesn't exist? </quote> Religious people will always tell you there is plenty of evidence. The problem is their idea of evidence isn't scientific. They cite their "feelings" like sensing God. Or cite the Bible. Because they think its a historical document. You can't win when you get into that kind of debate with religious people</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1